Sounding logo transparent

Member Login | Register | Forgot Password or Username

  • Home
  • Family
    • icon-home.png All Articles
    • icon-post.png Parenting
    • icon-post.png Traditions
    • icon-post.png Marriage
  • OrthoBasics
    • icon-home.png All Articles
    • icon-post.png Orthodox Basics
    • icon-post.png Bible
  • Culture
    • icon-home.png All Articles
    • icon-post.png Book Reviews
    • icon-post.png Movie Reviews
    • icon-post.png Pop Culture
  • Nature & Health
  • Travel
    • icon-home.png All Articles
    • icon-post.png Lenten Journey
    • icon-post.png Finding The Flame
  • Missions
    • icon-home.png All Articles
    • icon-post.png North America
    • icon-post.png International
  • Current
  • Art & Lit
    • icon-home.png All Articles
    • icon-post.png Orthodox Series
    • icon-post.png Poetry
    • icon-post.png Behind the Book
    • icon-post.png Iconography
  • Education
  • Ministries
    • icon-home.png All Articles
    • icon-post.png Called to Serve
    • icon-post.png Youth/Young Adult
Wednesday, 08 February 2012 10:55

Orthodox Bishops Protest HHS Ruling

Written by  Ernesto M. Obregon
  • Print
  • Email
  • 2 comments
Rate this item
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
(4 votes)

Last month, the United States Department of Health and Human Services decided that religious institutions that were not directly related to “ministry” work were not exempt from a requirement that they provide contraceptive services to all their employees.

In response to that decision, the Assembly of Canonical Orthodox Bishops of North and Central America, which is comprised of the 65 canonical Orthodox bishops in the United States, Canada and Mexico, issued a statement which said in part:

In this ruling by HHS, religious hospitals, educational institutions, and other organizations will be required to pay for the full cost of contraceptives (including some abortion-inducing drugs) and sterilizations for their employees, regardless of the religious convictions of the employers.

The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees the free exercise of religion. This freedom is transgressed when a religious institution is required to pay for “contraceptive services” including abortion-inducing drugs and sterilization services that directly violate their religious convictions. Providing such services should not be regarded as mandated medical care. We, the Assembly of Canonical Orthodox Bishops, call upon HHS Secretary Sebelius and the Obama Administration to rescind this unjust ruling and to respect the religious freedom guaranteed all Americans by the First Amendment.

It gladdens my heart to see this fast response by our bishops, and it should gladden your heart. We live in a country in which freedom of religion means more than just the private right to go to a church building and worship on Sunday. It also means the right to have religious institutions that give a public face to our personal beliefs. This freedom sometimes leads to some rather messy situations, but it is an important freedom. Because it is such an important freedom, you need to understand what this freedom means and what it does not mean.

It means that we are free to worship God without fear our worship being forbidden. It also means that we may not forbid other religious people from expressing themselves in worship. One of the court rulings in our country forbad Dade County, Florida, from outlawing animal sacrifices, even if it were within the Miami city limits. It means that even zoning ordinances may not be used to forbid group Bible Studies in private houses, nor forbid a worship site from being established within a particular neighborhood. But, it also means that “despised” groups also have the right to establish their worship places. So, the fight to establish a mosque within the general area of the no-longer-existing World Trade Center in New York City is a fight that was bound to be decided in favor of the mosque. The Bill of Rights was designed to protect despised groups, as this country was settled by despised groups.

But this is a messy freedom. It is a freedom that sometimes has various subtleties. For instance, I am convinced that our bishops are fully correct in fighting for the right of religious institutions to have boundaries that are consonant with their religious beliefs. It is important that the government recognize that religion is not merely a Sunday worship experience but is also the care for the sick that is expressed in Catholic and Protestant hospitals. It is the concern for children that is expressed in parish schools. It is the concern for the poor that is expressed in thrift stores run by various churches.

At the same time, religion cannot be used as a reason for individuals or corporations to refuse employment or to refuse service to someone. I live in Birmingham, Alabama. The history of this city during the civil rights era is an argument for why religions cannot always trump other concerns. There were those, back in the civil rights era here in Birmingham, who would argue that freedom of religion meant that an ardent Baptist need not hire African-Americans to work in his factory. The various civil rights acts codify the idea that an individual or a corporations may not use his/her religion as the sole reason to deny employment or service to a protected individual. Were it not for the civil rights movement and the various decrees that came from those years, it is likely that employment in Birmingham, Alabama, would still be a matter of whites in charge, blacks as low-level low-paid workers. Yes it is quite messy!

So, let’s get behind our bishops and write our representatives. I am convinced that HHS made the wrong decision. But, at the same time, let’s use this as an opportunity to realize that our cherished freedoms are not always as clear cut as we tend to believe. I am convinced that God had a strong hand in the founding of this country. But, I am also Latin American. This means that I agree with an old Latin American concept that says that “el diablo metio su cola,” that is that the devil stuck his tail in. Let us make sure to analyze our history and to be aware of the subtleties that are often present.

Read 388 times
Tweet
Published in Current Topics
Tagged under
  • HHS
  • protest
  • contraception
  • religious freedom
  • Orthodox bishops
Ernesto M. Obregon

Ernesto M. Obregon

I am a Cuban. My sister and I arrived in the United States of America in 1961. I was nine years old at the time and my sister was five. Yes, alone, our mother, a widow, put us on the plane in La Habana, and we were taken to an orphanage upon our arrival in Miami. No, I never lived in Miami for longer than about six months. Yes, our mother and us were re-united. She escaped from Cuba by boat about four or five months after we arrived in the USA. We were re-united and were sent by the Catholic Welfare folk to Ohio, where they had found my mother a job and us a foster home while she learned English and got situated. So, I grew up in Ohio, had a paper route, learned to build snowmen, and moved from place to place as out mother got better jobs. Eventually she met a good man and re-married and we settled into his house in Mansfield, Ohio. I was a 15 year old teenager.

Needless to say, none of this was necessarily guaranteed to keep me strong in the faith, although my mother tried. I rebelled during my teenage years and left Roman Catholicism for some vague hippie philosophies and a lot of rebellion. By 1970 I had been expelled from college after my first year, a year in which I was very confused and quite directionless. When I returned to Mansfield in defeat, I was approached by a friend who had become a “Jesus Person.” He took me to this “farm” that was filled with about four middle-aged adults and lots of early 20′s Jesus People. One of those adults was a Southern Baptist pastor, a former Campus Crusade staffer, and uncomfortable supervisor of hippy Jesus People, and is now the Very Rev. Gordon Walker, an Archpriest of the Antiochian Orthodox Archdiocese. His story, along with others whom I know, is chronicled in the book, “Becoming Orthodox” by the Very Rev. Peter Gillquist.

My journey was different. I eventually ended up as an Anglican priest, and a missionary. My wife and I served in both Bolivia and Perú, and our three intelligent and very perspicacious daughters spent a decade of their formative years in South America. I ended up as The Archdeacon of Arequipa of the Anglican Church of Perú, which is part of the Anglican Province of the Southern Cone, which is part of the Anglican Communion. We returned to the USA when our children began to attend college and I took a parish in one of the dioceses of The Episcopal Church. Within less than four years we realized that this was not a Church in which I could doctrinally live.

It was at this point that Fr. Gordon Walker came actively back into my life and told me that it was time that I came into Orthodoxy. He was right, and I have been Orthodox ever since. I was ordained in the Antiochian Orthodox jurisdiction, but am currently serving as an attached priest at a Greek Orthodox Church. God has blessed. We have wonderful grandchildren. And we are truly blessed.

Website: Orthodox Priest

Social Profiles for this Contributor

Facebook Twitter

Latest from Ernesto M. Obregon

  • Politics and Orthodox Clergy
  • One in Christ, Divided in Politics
  • I must die before I die, so that when I die, I will not die.
  • Self-defense, soldiers, and Orthodoxy
  • For the Orthodox, Church history is family history

Related items

  • Really...
  • Orthodox bishops step into the fracas. Will we?
More in this category: « Do you speak Christian? Orthodox bishops step into the fracas. Will we? »
0 subscriber

Comment subscription

Receive email notification when a new comment is added to this item.
  • You must be registered to subscribe.

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated. Basic HTML code is allowed. Your comment will be approved before publication. Only submit your comment once. A message will appear under the captcha below letting you know your comment has been submitted successfully.

2 comments

  • Comment Link Wednesday, 08 February 2012 20:34 posted by Mary-Linda Flessas

    The HHS, and Obama Administration, have again gone beyond their authority. When women chose to have 'control of their own bodies' they did not consider the ramifications. As a woman, and an Orthodox Christian, it belittles me as a woman when others use abortion as birth control. I have control over my own body, with modesty. I certainly do not agree with any of my monies helping to pay killers of sacred human life. Our religious organizations, churches, and communities must stand firm in these days of evil.

  • Comment Link Wednesday, 08 February 2012 15:33 posted by Grace Brooks

    Well said! In seeing how laid-back the office of HHS was in delivering this ruling, I get the impression that they had no idea that any religious people would bother to stand up for things as old-fashioned as their integrity. I hope they've been surprised so far, but I think that it's important for Orthodox to weigh in as well. I'm very pleased that our bishops have led the way for us.

back to top

OCN | Contributors |Sitemap| Contact Us
The views and opinions expressed on this blog are those solely of the authors and do not represent the official opinion of the Orthodox Christian Network or the Orthodox Church.